DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2021.120108S
SUNIL KAPUR, MD1
1Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Download PDF |
|
KEYWORDS. Atrial isochronal late-activation mapping, atypical atrial flutter, critical isthmus.
Dr. Kapur receives consulting fees/honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, and Novartis.
Address correspondence to: Sunil Kapur, MD. Email: skapur@bwh.harvard.edu
Ablation of atypical atrial flutter is an increasingly challenging and prevalent problem. However, while induction of the arrhythmia is fundamental to the ablation strategy, this may not be universally possible. As an alternative, ultra–high-density mapping during sinus rhythm allows for the creation of isochronal late-activation maps (ILAMs) in patients with ventricular tachycardia and facilitates the identification of a critical isthmus even without induction of the ventricular arrhythmia. Creating an ILAM of the left atrium has not been systematically evaluated and it is not known whether additional ablation in these areas improves freedom from all atrial arrhythmias.
We report a case of left atrial mapping performed using the Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter, Sensor Enabled™ in a patient referred for atypical atrial flutter ablation after prior pulmonary vein isolation. The arrhythmia could not be induced at the start of the case; subsequently, a left atrial map with high right atrial pacing was created and we identified a deceleration zone on the anterior left atrium (Figure 1 and Video 1). Subsequent induction of the arrhythmia was possible and activation mapping suggested the previously identified region was the critical isthmus. Ablation in this region terminated the tachycardia. This case supports the validity of atrial ILAM as a strategy for the empiric ablation of atypical atrial flutter.
Figure 1: A: Atrial ILAM with right atrial pacing. B: ILAM of induced tachycardia. |
Video 1: Atypical flutter with atrial ILAM correlating with the critical isthmus. |
All published case image reviews within the print supplement and ePub version have been independently submitted and developed exclusively by the authors. Each published case image review within the print and ePub version has successfully undergone the double-blind peer-review process. The opinions presented herein are specific to the featured physicians and are for informational purposes only. The results from any case study may not be predictive of results for all patients. These case study reviews are not intended to provide medical advice or to take the place of written law or regulations. The distribution of the print supplement and ePub version is supported through a grant from: Abbott
|