Journal of Innovation in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Articles Articles 2022 September 2022 - Volume 13 Issue 9

Change in Atrial Activation Patterns During Narrow Complex Tachycardia: What Is the Mechanism?

DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2022.130901

ŞIHO HIDAYET, MD,1 AHMET KORKMAZ, MD,2 TURHAN TURAN, MD,3 ABDULLAH TUNÇEZ, MD,4 MERYEM KARA, MD,2 ELIF HANDE OZCAN CETIN, MD,2 OZCAN OZEKE, MD,2 SERKAN CAY, MD,2 FIRAT OZCAN, MD,2 DURSUN ARAS, MD,5 and SERKAN TOPALOGLU, MD2

1Department of Cardiology, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey

2Department of Cardiology, Health Sciences University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

3Health Sciences University, Ahi Evren Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey

4Department of Cardiology, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

5Department of Cardiology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

PDF Download PDF
tweeter Follow Us >>

ABSTRACT.A change in the coronary sinus (CS) activation pattern from an eccentric to a concentric pattern during the ablation of an orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia might falsely suggest the presence of a second (septal) accessory pathway (AP) during tachycardia or the successful ablation of the left lateral AP under ventricular pacing despite persistent and unaffected AP conduction. Complete or partial intra-atrial block should be suspected when an abrupt change in the atrial activation sequence is noted during catheter ablation at the posterolateral and lateral aspects of the mitral annulus. The correct anatomical position of the CS catheter plays a vital role in the differential diagnosis of this situation.

KEYWORDS.AVRT, intra-atrial conduction block, mitral isthmus line.

The authors report no conflicts of interest for the published content. No funding information was provided.
Manuscript received January 30, 2022. Final version accepted May 5, 2022.
Address correspondence to: Ozcan Ozeke, MD, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Ankara Şehir Hastanesi, Kardiyoloji Klinigi, Bilkent, Ankara 06100, Turkey. Email: ozcanozeke@gmail.com.

Case presentation

A 33-year-old male patient with a history of attempted ablation for Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome utilizing a left lateral pathway was brought to the electrophysiology laboratory because of his recurrent palpitations. A 12-lead electrocardiogram showed no baseline pre-excitation. On electrophysiological study, an anterograde investigation demonstrated a dual atrioventricular nodal physiology. Programmed atrial stimulation easily and reproducibly induced narrow QRS tachycardia (Figure 1). A premature ventricular beat timed when the His was refractory readily pre-excited the next atrial electrogram, confirming the presence of an accessory pathway (AP) (Figure 2). A change in the atrial activation pattern during narrow complex tachycardia was observed without a change in the tachycardia cycle length (Figure 3). What are the mechanisms of tachycardia and change in retrograde atrial activation patterns?

CRM1442_Ozeke-f1.jpg

Figure 1: A narrow QRS tachycardia with an apparently concentric retrograde atrial activation.

CRM1442_Ozeke-f2.jpg

Figure 2: A premature ventricular beat (arrow) timed when the His is refractory readily pre-excites the next atrial electrogram.

CRM1442_Ozeke-f3.jpg

Figure 3: A change in the atrial activation pattern during the narrow complex tachycardia is seen without a change in the tachycardia cycle length.

Discussion

A change in the coronary sinus (CS) activation pattern from an eccentric to a concentric pattern during ablation of the left lateral AP has been previously described.13 The presence of a second AP or an alternative arrhythmia mechanism should be kept in mind. First, the reversal of eccentric atrial excitation during orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia may falsely suggest the presence of a second (septal) AP. On the other hand, when performing an ablation procedure with ventricular pacing, the operator could be misled to think that successful ablation has been performed due to the change from an eccentric atrial excitation pattern to a concentric pattern. This is despite persistent and unaffected AP conduction. However, if the CS catheter were advanced more anterolaterally (Figure 5), this would identify the persistence of the left lateral AP.1,2,47 Differential atrial entrainment from both CS distal (Figure 4) and proximal (Figure 5) sites revealed discordant results. The proximal CS is out of the circuit, but the distal CS is in the re-entry circuit. A possible mechanism of this phenomenon is the occurrence of an intra-atrial conduction block at the mitral isthmus level medial to the insertion of the AP.3 This is shown by the distal CS having a sharp, early A with the subsequent reversal from proximal to distal in the remaining electrograms (Figure 6). This is essentially a “signature” for this phenomenon. Luria et al. reported that intra-atrial conduction block may occur in 6.9% of left free-wall AP cases following radiofrequency (RF) delivery along the mitral isthmus, which anatomically is the narrower conductive tissue between the mitral annulus and the left inferior pulmonary vein.2 However, intra-atrial conduction block can occur even in a wide mitral isthmus, possibly because of areas of pre-existing functional block or scar.8 This phenomenon should be considered when evaluating patients who have undergone previous left lateral AP ablation of another concomitant AP or RF applications in inappropriate areas.3

CRM1442_Ozeke-f4.jpg

Figure 4: Short post-pacing interval response to atrial entrainment from the distal coronary sinus.

CRM1442_Ozeke-f5.jpg

Figure 5: Long post-pacing interval response to atrial entrainment from the proximal coronary sinus.

CRM1442_Ozeke-f6.jpg

Figure 6: Coronary sinus activation sequence where the coronary sinus catheter is advanced more anterolaterally.

References

  1. Kalra D, Morady F. Supraventricular tachycardia: what is the mechanism? Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(8):1219–1220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Luria DM, Nemec J, Etheridge SP, et al. Intra-atrial conduction block along the mitral valve annulus during accessory pathway ablation: evidence for a left atrial “isthmus”. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001;12(7):744–749. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Asvestas D, Tzeis S, Letsas K, Goga C, Efremidis M, Vardas P. Intra-atrial conduction block during radiofrequency ablation of left-sided accessory pathways. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022;13(2):4884–4888. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vadivelu R, Lokhandwala Y, Bansal R. Changing atrial activation patterns during narrow complex tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(9):2519–2521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nair K, Selvaraj R, Ho KL, Nanthakumar K. To the editor – his capture and entrainment. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(2):e2; author reply e-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pap R, Saghy L. Conflicting results of pacing maneuvers during supraventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35(11):1392–1394. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shauer A, Danon A, Singh SM. An atypical presentation of a typical arrhythmia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39(6):612–615. [CrossRef]
  8. Bulava A, Hanis J, Sitek D. Mitral isthmus conduction block: intriguing result of radiofrequency catheter ablation for a left concealed accessory pathway. Europace. 2010;12(4):579–581. [CrossRef] [PubMed]