Journal of Innovation in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Articles Articles 2025 February 2025 - Volume 16 Issue 2

Brugada Phenocopy due to Hyponatremia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2025.16026

CHRISTOS S. KONSTANTINOU, MD,1 DIMITRIOS SFAIROPOULOS, MD,1 KONSTANTINOS ZEKIOS, MD,1 KONSTANTINOS P. LETSAS, MD, PhD, FEHRA,2 and PANAGIOTIS KORANTZOPOULOS, MD, PhD, FEHRA1

1First Department of Cardiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece

2Arrhythmia Unit, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece

PDF Download PDF
tweeter Follow Us >>

ABSTRACT.Brugada phenocopy (BrP) is the electrocardiographic appearance of a Brugada pattern due to various reversible causes that is completely resolved after the correction of the underlying abnormalities. In this short communication, we describe a 56-year-old man who had a transient BrP induced by hyponatremia due to thiazide diuretic therapy. A detailed review of the literature revealed that hyponatremia represents an uncommon cause of BrP while, in many of the published cases, concomitant electrolyte disturbances such as hyperkalemia were present. However, even isolated hyponatremia may provoke a BrP. Clinicians should be aware of this rare cause of BrP, which is reversible and has a favorable outcome.

KEYWORDS.Brugada phenocopy, Brugada syndrome, electrolyte abnormalities, hyponatremia.

The authors report no conflicts of interest for the published content. No funding information was provided.
Manuscript received June 10, 2024. Final version accepted August 26, 2024.
Address correspondence to: Professor Panagiotis Korantzopoulos, MD, PhD, FEHRA, First Department of Cardiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, 45110 Ioannina, Greece. Email: pkorantz@uoi.gr; p.korantzopoulos@yahoo.gr.

Introduction

Brugada syndrome (BrS) represents an inherited channelopathy, associated with a risk for sudden cardiac death, diagnosed when a coved-type ST-segment elevation is present in leads V1 and/or V2 placed in the standard or higher positions.1,2 Given that BrS is usually asymptomatic, the diagnosis is often incidental in patients investigated for other medical conditions. Moreover, it is not always evident in the electrocardiogram (ECG) and can be unmasked by various conditions, such as fever or administration of class I anti-arrhythmic drugs. However, several reversible clinical conditions, such as myocardial ischemia, electrolyte abnormalities, pulmonary embolism, right ventricular mechanical compression, and others, may provoke transient electrocardiographic abnormalities mimicking BrS. This phenomenon is termed Brugada phenocopy (BrP) and should be differentiated from BrS.3,4

Case presentation

A 56-year-old man presented to the emergency department of our hospital complaining of general weakness and numbness in the lower extremities. His past medical history was significant only for hypertension treated with a fixed combination of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (150 + 12.5 mg/day). This medication was initiated 15 days before, while the patient was taking only irbesartan until this time point. No other acute medical illness was noted at his presentation. The clinical examination was unremarkable, while the core body temperature was 36.5°C. He denied any history of palpitations or syncopal episodes. Also, his family history was unremarkable. Of note, the blood biochemical tests showed hyponatremia (Na+: 125 mEq/L) and marginal potassium levels (K+: 3.5 mEq/L), while magnesium levels were normal (Mg2+: 2 mg/dL). The rest of the blood laboratory tests, including troponin and thyroid function tests, were all within normal limits. Interestingly, a 12-lead ECG on admission showed concave ST-segment elevation and negative T-waves in leads V1 and V2, consistent with the Brugada type I pattern (Figure 1). Despite the presence of some artifacts in lead V1, lead V2 was more consistent with the type I Brugada pattern (Figure 1). No specific cause of hyponatremia was evident apart from the diuretic use.

CRM1627_Korantzopoulos-f1.jpg

Figure 1: The patient’s 12-lead electrocardiogram on admission.

The patient was admitted to our department, and his anti-hypertensive medication was replaced by valsartan 160 mg plus amlodipine 5 mg. An echocardiogram and a myocardial perfusion scan (single photon emission computed tomography) showed no significant abnormalities. On the fifth day of hospitalization, the ECG completely normalized, with no ST-segment elevation in leads V1 and V2, even in high precordial positions (second intercostal space) (Figures 2A and 2B). This normalization became evident, along with the resolution of hyponatremia. Specifically, on the fifth day of hospitalization, serum Na+ was 137 mEq/L and serum K+ was 3.9 mEq/L. Moreover, a drug provocative test using procainamide (10 mg/kg, infusion for 10 min) did not reveal any abnormality. The patient was discharged the following day in excellent clinical condition. Six months after the index hospitalization, he remains asymptomatic, having a normal ECG with no ST-segment elevation in V1–V2, even in high precordial positions (Figures 3A and 3B), and normal serum electrolyte levels receiving valsartan and amlodipine.

CRM1627_Korantzopoulos-f2.jpg

Figure 2: A: The 12-lead electrocardiogram on the fifth day of hospitalization with V1–V2 leads on standard positions. B: The 12-lead electrocardiogram on the fifth day of hospitalization with V1–V2 leads to higher positions over the second intercostal space.

CRM1627_Korantzopoulos-f3.jpg

Figure 3: A: The 12-lead electrocardiogram 6 months after hospitalization with V1–V2 leads on standard positions. B: The 12-lead electrocardiogram 6 months after hospitalization with V1–V2 leads moved to higher positions over the second intercostal space.

The patient gave signed consent for publication of his medical case anonymously and without showing his face. The report has been approved by the local institutional ethics committee.

Discussion and literature review

BrP is considered a relatively benign electrocardiographic phenomenon that should be carefully recognized and characterized since the diagnosis of BrS has a different therapeutic approach. Remarkably, patients exhibiting BrP have reversible underlying conditions. Therefore, BrS and BrP cannot be differentiated by their ECG patterns. In BrP, there is a clear reversible underlying condition, and thus the ECG abnormality is transient. However, the exact mechanisms and the prognosis of BrP remain elusive. Transient abnormalities in ion currents induced by various factors seem to underlie the observed electrocardiographic alterations that resemble the type I Brugada pattern.3,4 Correspondingly to the depolarization and repolarization theories of BrS, transient conditions that cause transmural gradients in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) due to the different distribution of transient outward K+ current (Ito) current or delayed depolarization of the RVOT causing conduction delay and creating an electrical gradient may account for the electrocardiographic abnormalities associated with BrP. It is believed that genetic abnormalities of cardiac ion channels are not present in cases of BrP. However, subtle genetic variants predisposing to BrP3 or some shared with BrS ionic alterations4 cannot be ruled out. Besides, electrolyte abnormalities that may facilitate such electrical disturbances, inflammatory conditions such as pericarditis/myocarditis, ischemia or coronary artery spasm (especially in the right coronary artery), mechanical compression (eg, tumors), pressure overload, and stretch causing mechanoelectrical disturbances (eg, pulmonary embolism) in the RV or the RVOT area have been associated with BrP. Bearing in mind that all the aforementioned transient abnormalities may facilitate the unmasking of BrS, after resolution of the Brugada pattern, a negative sodium channel blocker provocative test is obligatory to establish the BrP diagnosis.3,4

Regarding metabolic and electrolyte disturbances, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, and hypercalcemia are the most frequently reported causes of BrP.3 Hyponatremia is a not-so-common cause of BrP that is increasingly reported in the literature.517 A systematic review of the literature revealed seven published cases of BrP induced by hyponatremia without other extra causes (Table 1).510 The most common causes included psychogenic polydipsia and diuretic therapy (Table 1). In another eight published cases of hyponatremia-induced BrP, there were concomitant abnormalities that contributed to the manifestation of BrP, most commonly hyperkalemia.1117 Almost all patients exhibited the Brugada I pattern at presentation (Tables 1 and 2). Of note, no previous publication reported an ECG with high precordial leads after resolution of the electrocardiographic abnormalities. Moreover, in only two cases, a drug provocation test was performed after the normalization of the ECG.11,12 It should also be noted that, in the second case by Agrawal and colleagues,7 the ECG does not show a clear Brugada pattern. Additionally, in the study by Ayad and colleagues,16 the initial ECG mentioned to exhibit the Brugada pattern is not included in the article.

Table 1: Cases of Brugada Phenocopy Induced by Hyponatremia Without Additional Causes

CRM1627_Korantzopoulos-t1.jpg

Table 2: Cases of Brugada Phenocopy Induced by Hyponatremia and Other Concomitant Abnormalities

CRM1627_Korantzopoulos-t2.jpg

The available literature suggests that, in most cases, the BrP is benign, but such may depend on the underlying condition, while relative prospective data are very few.3,4,18 In the setting of hyperkalemia, the study by Xu et al. showed that hyperkalemia-induced BrP is not associated with sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrhythmias.19 However, in another study, malignant arrhythmias in the setting of hyperkalemia were more frequent in those who had a concomitant Brugada pattern, indicating a high-risk group.20 Also, malignant arrhythmias may occur in cases of BrP in the setting of drug intoxication.21 It could be speculated that the presence of BrP may be related to the severity of the underlying condition that obviously should be promptly and effectively treated. In other words, BrP patients do not develop life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in the long term, and therefore implantable cardioverter-defibrillators should not be implanted.

In this case report, our patient had no other concomitant abnormality, and no structural heart disease was evident. In our patient, complete resolution of the Brugada type I pattern coincided with the correction of the sodium levels. The cessation of the offending agent (hydrochlorothiazide) was sufficient for the effective management of hyponatremia and led to the resolution of the electrocardiographic abnormalities. Indeed, drug-induced hyponatremia is a common clinical problem, while diuretics are the most common culprit agents.22 Moreover, the subsequent negative provocative test using a sodium channel blocker and the absence of Brugada pattern recurrence after correction of hyponatremia point against the diagnosis of BrS and favor a BrP phenomenon. ECG recordings, even in high V1–V2 leads, 6 months after the index event did not demonstrate a Brugada pattern. It should be pointed out that drug challenge provocative tests have limited sensitivity for the diagnosis of BrS.1,2 Genetic testing is also non-conclusive in several cases, and it is not ideal even for familial screening.1,2 Of note, no genetic testing was performed in any of the published cases of hyponatremia-associated BrP.

Conclusion

Hyponatremia is a rare cause of BrP and should be included in its potential causes. Clinicians should be aware of the BrP, a reversible and benign condition with a favorable outcome in most instances. A misleading diagnosis of BrS may lead to unnecessary diagnostic procedures and false management plans that may have an adverse impact on patients’ outcomes.

References

  1. Brugada J, Campuzano O, Arbelo E, Sarquella-Brugada G, Brugada R. Present status of Brugada syndrome: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(9):1046–1059. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Krahn AD, Behr ER, Hamilton R, Probst V, Laksman Z, Han HC. Brugada syndrome. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8(3):386–405. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Anselm DD, Evans JM, Baranchuk A. Brugada phenocopy: a new electrocardiogram phenomenon. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(3):81–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. de Oliveira Neto NR, de Oliveira WS, Mastrocola F, Sacilotto L. Brugada phenocopy: mechanisms, diagnosis, and implications. J Electrocardiol. 2019;55:45–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tamene A, Sattiraju S, Wang K, Benditt DG. Brugada-like electrocardiography pattern induced by severe hyponatraemia. Europace. 2010;12(6):905–907. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Alvarez PA, Vázquez Blanco M, Lerman J. Brugada type 1 electrocardiographic pattern induced by severe hyponatremia. Cardiology. 2011;118(2):97–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Agrawal Y, Aggarwal S, Kalavakunta JK, Gupta V. All that looks like “Brugada” is not “Brugada”: case series of Brugada phenocopy caused by hyponatremia. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2016;28(4):274–277. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ramsaroop K, Seecheran R, Seecheran V, et al. Suspected hyponatremia-induced Brugada phenocopy. Int Med. Case Rep J. 2019;12:61–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rattanawong P, Senthong V. Hyponatremia induced Brugada syndrome mimicking ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Arrhythm. 2021;37(5):1377–1379. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yılmaz E, Özdemir F. Brugada phenocopy induced by hypovolemic hyponatremia. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45667. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kovacic JC, Kuchar DL. Brugada pattern electrocardiographic changes associated with profound electrolyte disturbance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(7):1020–1023. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mok NS, Tong CK, Yuen HC. Concomitant-acquired long QT and Brugada syndromes associated with indapamide-induced hypokalemia and hyponatremia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31(6):772–775. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hunuk A, Hunuk B, Kusken O, Onur OE. Brugada phenocopy induced by electrolyte disorder: a transient electrocardiographic sign. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21(4):429–432. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alanzalon RE, Burris JR, Vinocur JM. Brugada phenocopy associated with diabetic ketoacidosis in two pediatric patients. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51(2):323–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Landa E, Sharifi S, Abraham J, Vigandt E, Munzinger E. Brugada pattern phenocopy induced by diabetic ketoacidosis. Cureus. 2021;13(5):e15066. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ayad S, Alyacoub R, Gergis K, et al. Fever and hyponatremia unmasking Brugada pattern electrocardiogram in a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e18578. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Amusina O, Mehta S, Nelson ME. Brugada phenocopy secondary to hyperkalemia and hyponatremia in primary adrenal insufficiency. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022;3(4):e12800. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Adytia GJ, Sutanto H. Brugada phenocopy vs. Brugada syndrome: delineating the differences for optimal diagnosis and management. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024;49(6):102566. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xu G, Gottschalk BH, Anselm DD, et al. Relation of the Brugada phenocopy to hyperkalemia (from the International Registry on Brugada Phenocopy). Am J Cardiol. 2018;121(6):715–717. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rivera-Juárez A, Hernández-Romero I, Puertas C, et al. Clinical characteristics and electrophysiological mechanisms underlying Brugada ECG in patients with severe hyperkalemia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(3):e010115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Otero D, Petrovic M, Liao SL. Brugada phenocopy: a case of incessant ventricular tachycardia in a patient with tricyclic antidepressant overdose. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020;16(3):245–248. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liamis G, Megapanou E, Elisaf M, Milionis H. Hyponatremia-inducing drugs. Front Horm Res. 2019;52:167–177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]